SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 437

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ROHAN CHANDRAWATI TANAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceeding SL.

Date s or COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

18.02.2026 WPPIL No. 61 of 2023 Rohan Chandrawati Tanay --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

1. Sri Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Sri B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel with Sri Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 6.

4. Sri Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board.

5. In WPPIL No. 232 of 2025 titled as ‘Shri Satnam Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand and others’, a detailed order has been passed today after hearing counsel for the parties. The petitioner, therein, has been permitted to file objection before the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board in respect of alleged breach of the conditions imposed by the Irrigation Department while granting the No Objection Certificate and on basis of which Consent to Establish was granted in favour of the private respondent. The Uttarakhand Poll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top