SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 458

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAAJID QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1 No.2484 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Arvind Vashishta, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Disha Vashistha, Advocate, holding brief of Dr.

Neha Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the complainant.

2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.239 of 2025, under Section 103, 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352 & 117(2) of B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.

3. The applicant stands implicated in the aforesaid F.I.R. along with 11 named persons, but the charge sheet has been filed against only four, including the applicant. The applicant has remained in judicial custody since 14.08.2025, which spans over six months at this stage.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant vehemently argues false implication, drawing this Court’s pointed attention to the statements of witnesses Salman, Khushnasib, and Anis recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. by the Investigating Office

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top