HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAAJID QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.
and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1 No.2484 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Arvind Vashishta, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Disha Vashistha, Advocate, holding brief of Dr.
Neha Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the complainant.
2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.239 of 2025, under Section 103, 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352 & 117(2) of B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.
3. The applicant stands implicated in the aforesaid F.I.R. along with 11 named persons, but the charge sheet has been filed against only four, including the applicant. The applicant has remained in judicial custody since 14.08.2025, which spans over six months at this stage.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant vehemently argues false implication, drawing this Court’s pointed attention to the statements of witnesses Salman, Khushnasib, and Anis recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. by the Investigating Office
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.