HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINEETA CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.
and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 1256/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioner was serving as Head of Department in Government Polytechnic, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. By means of this writ petition, she has sought the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.01.2025 passed by respondent (contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to calculate her services according to rule 6(c) of the Uttarakhand Retirement Benfits Act, 2018 (Uttarakhand Act No. 17 of 2018) (as amended by UK Act No. 34 of 2018) and paid proportional pension, gratuity and other benefits to the petitioner with interest.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner applied for voluntary retirement, which was granted; however, pension and other benefits are not being release
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.