SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 507

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINEETA CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 1256/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Petitioner was serving as Head of Department in Government Polytechnic, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. By means of this writ petition, she has sought the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.01.2025 passed by respondent (contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to calculate her services according to rule 6(c) of the Uttarakhand Retirement Benfits Act, 2018 (Uttarakhand Act No. 17 of 2018) (as amended by UK Act No. 34 of 2018) and paid proportional pension, gratuity and other benefits to the petitioner with interest.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner applied for voluntary retirement, which was granted; however, pension and other benefits are not being release

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top