SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 515

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAUSHAD ALVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. Dat No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures SPLA No. 83 of 2025 With CRLA No. 205 of 2025 Naushad Alvi --Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., Mr. Harsh Vardhan Dhanik, learned counsel for Appellant.

2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Bharat Singh, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2.

4. There is no representation on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 whereas service upon them is sufficient. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

6. The matter is pending for consideration of the Delay Condonation Application (IA No. 01 of 2025).

7. Learned counsel for the Appellant, however, explains the delay as stated in the application filed before this Court. The delay of 56 days is well explained; therefore, the same is hereby condoned. Accordingly, the Delay Condonation Application is allowed.

8. The present Application has been filed by the Complainant seeking Special Leave to Appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2024, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, Haridwar i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top