SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 533

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Gurdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures C482 No.1305 of 2016 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Anmol Sandhu, Advocate for respondent no.2.

2. Present criminal misc. application is filed with the prayer to set-aside/quash the impugned charge sheet dated 31.03.2016, summoning/cognizance order dated 29.06.2016 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3029 of 2016, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldwani, District Nainital on the basis of compromise between the parties.

3. Compounding application (I.A. No.1289 of 2026) is filed in the matter, wherein it is prayed to compound the offence between the parties.

4. Parties appeared before this Court, who are duly identified by their respective counsel. Parties have also filed their respective affidavits stating the facts of compromise between them.

5. It is jointly submitted by the parties that they have settled their scores.

6. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the compounding application.

7. Hon’ble Sup

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top