SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 587

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUBHAM VASHISTH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
C482 2760 / 2019



Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or No Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures C-482 No. 2760 of 2019 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.

4. The present criminal misc. application is filed with the prayer to set-aside/quash the charge sheet dated 06.04.2019, cognizance/summoning order dated 13.08.2019 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 11776 of 2019, State Vs. Shubham Vashisth, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 498-A of IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Probhition Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, District Haridwar, on the basis of compromise between the parties.

5. Compounding application is also filed in the matter wherein it is prayed to compound the offence between the parties under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 498-A of IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Probhition Act.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have entered into a compromise.

7. Parties are virtually present before this Court and are duly identified by their respective counsels. Parties have also filed their respective affidavits stating the facts of compromise between them. It is submitted by the parties that they have entered into a compromise and have decided to live separately pursuant to which they have moved an application for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top