SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 588

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
BAST 7 / 2026



2026:UHC:1364 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. Dat or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No. e and Registrar’s order with Signatures BAST No. 07 of 2026 Suraj --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The Applicant is an accused in connection with FIR No. 22 of 2025 dated 11.02.2025, registered under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Pulbhatta, District Udham Singh Nagar.

4. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned State Counsel. Perused the record.

5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the present application has been moved seeking short-term bail to enable the Applicant to attend the marriage ceremony of his sister, namely Rakshi Kashyap, which is scheduled to be solemnized on 04.04.2026. It is submitted that the original copy of the wedding invitation card has been annexed along with an affidavit as Annexure No. 1. It is further submitted that the presence of the Applicant is necessary to participate in and perform family responsibilities related to the marriage ceremony.

6. Learned State Counsel has opposed the Short-Term Bail Application; however, he does not dispute the factum of the marriage ceremony as reflected from the invitation card brought on record.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the Applicant seeks bail for a

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top