HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPMB 108 / 2026
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
25TH FEBRUARY, 2026 WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) No. 108 OF 2026 Ramesh Chandra.
…Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents Counsel for the petitioner. : Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (per Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
1. The case of the petitioner is that, for the purposes of submitting application for grant of a mining lease in District Bageshwar, instead of depositing the application fee of Rupees Three Lakhs in Treasury Office, Bageshwar, he deposited the same in Treasury Office, Haridwar. After realizing the mistake, the petitioner deposited another sum of Rupees Three Lakhs in Treasury Office, Bageshwar. He, thereafter, filed an application for refund of Rupees Three Lakhs deposited in the District Treasury Office, Haridwar. The Chief Treasury Officer, Haridwar, on 25.09.2019, wrote to the In-charge Officer, representing the District Magistrate, Haridwar, to issue necessary advisory, so that the amount could be refunded to the petitioner.
2. The case of the petitioner is that, so far respondent no. 3 has not issued the necessary advisory, and, as a result whereof, the amount, which was erroneously deposited by the petitioner at the Treasury Office, Haridwar, has not been refunded to him so far.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is foregoing the claim for interest, but his only prayer is that his application, for refund of the amount, be allowed.
4. Learned State Counsel does not object to the prayer made in this behalf.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent no. 3 to issue necessary advisory to the Treasury Officer, Haridwar, for refund of the amount to the petitioner, within two weeks from the date of communication of the instant order. The Chief Treasury Officer, Haridwar will ensure refund of the amount to the petitioner, within a further period of two weeks.
6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
7. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
______________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 25th February, 2026 Rahul R PR A A H J U A L P ATI DDo21psCcD e n .b u o A iN a 5 r g = f = s t Di : 44 a i e t R t Hc a 1 c l : a A 2 N = l8 I 5 2 l C G0 H I u 4 C 0 yN o =H 8 m U2 3 s, d a7 6 9L i Co be g 4 . 0 = 0 O P 4 =e n 1 A 2 H f R r2 U e 9a 1= .A 6 Id 8 R3 A G 33 6J 3 bT b 0 A H 0 e e 1 3 y O DP d 6 C B1 A R F 8 7 6 : O 5 4 , A c BT U s 5 U 3 I3 H 9 t T C : 9 R = 9 0 1 U e 8 T 4 3 U A L 3 4 5 9 O T + R 0 1 P 7 7 0 AF 6 4 R D A 5 3 5 K AU 5 2 R ' D c H 3 8 J 5 T Af A 0 3 Ab1 4 K ' 4 P d1 A 0 N HA A 4 A a RD AC 5b T E A,1 I N 4 , 4 K 6 5C D H e B2 , A d F8 N 3 8A e A D 4 6 18 , 99 e 28 6 F,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.