SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 611

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures C-482 No.1166 of 2022 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Vinod Joshi proxy counsel for Ms. Neetu Singh, learned counsel for the applicants.

2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State.

3. Ms. Komal Kandpal, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.

4. The present C-482 application has been filed seeking quashing of the chargesheet, cognizance/summoning order dated 08.07.2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st, Roorkee, District Hardwar in Criminal Case No. 389 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 392, 506, 427 & 411 of I.P.C. as well as the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that initially an F.I.R. was lodged at the instance of respondent no.2 alleging that an altercation had taken place between the parties, during which applicant no.1, allegedly armed with a revolver, extended threats to respondent no.2 and his associates. It is further alleged in the said F.I.R. that applicant no.1, along with other co-accused, assaulted respondent no.2.

6. He would further submit that now t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top