SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 630

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MS MADAN SINGH KATHYAT CONTRACTOR – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S RI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.

AND HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.

24th February, 2026 Writ Petition (M/B) of 109 of 2026 M/S Madan Singh Kathayat Contractor ------------Petitioner Versus Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax Commissonerate, Dehradun and another --------Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Shri Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Pooja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State.

JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.

1. Heard Shri Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pooja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents-State.

2. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 73 (9) of the C.G.S.T Act/UKGST Act, demanding tax of Rs.9,58,343.12/-, along with penalty of Rs. 95,834.3/-, total sum of Rs. 10,54,177.42/-.

3. The case of the petitioner is that a Show Cause Notice was issued to the petitioner on 21.05.2024, whereby time was granted to the petitioner to submit his reply by 21.06.2024. By the same notice, date of personal hearing was fixed for 05.06.2024, i.e.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top