HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MUSSARAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.333 of 2026
13th February, 2026 Mussarat ………Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………..Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
This writ petition has been filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent- Prescribed Authority/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Haridwar, to take immediate and appropriate action against respondent no.5-Akram, Gram Pradhan, Gram Panchayat-
Kasampur, Block-Bahadrabad, District-Haridwar.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent no.5 was elected as Gram Pradhan, Gram Panchayat-Kasampur, Block-Bahadrabad, District-Haridwar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never passed High School Examination and the institution from where the respondent no.5 claims to have passed High School Examination has given a report to the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.