SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 687

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MUSSARAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.333 of 2026

13th February, 2026 Mussarat ………Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………..Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This writ petition has been filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent- Prescribed Authority/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Haridwar, to take immediate and appropriate action against respondent no.5-Akram, Gram Pradhan, Gram Panchayat-

Kasampur, Block-Bahadrabad, District-Haridwar.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent no.5 was elected as Gram Pradhan, Gram Panchayat-Kasampur, Block-Bahadrabad, District-Haridwar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never passed High School Examination and the institution from where the respondent no.5 claims to have passed High School Examination has given a report to the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top