SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 688

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MUDRIKA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or S N L o . . Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d o i n n s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No.335 of 2026 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.

2. Anil Kumar Dabral, Add. C.S.C. with Mr.

Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State.

3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, he is a landless person, who was allotted a piece of agricultural land declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, vide order dated 13.01.2006. Grievance raised by petitioner is that his name is not being recorded in Category 1 kha i.e. Bhumidhar with non-

transferable right.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon Section 131(d) of Uttarakhand Zamidari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 in support of his contention that every person, with whom surplus land is settled, is entitled to be recorded as Bhumidhar with nontransferable right. Section

131(d) of the aforesaid Statute is quoted below:- “131. Bhumidhar with nontransferable rights.- (d) with effect from July 1, 1981 every person with whom surplus land is or has been settled under 26A or sub-sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top