Office Notes, S L N o . . a D e t r a o e n r o p S o r d p o i r g d r R d r o n i t e e r c s a e g r , e t c i e u w o s t d i t r r i o r t e d in n h a s e g r s r ’ s s s WPSB/ 90/ 2023 COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner (appeared through V.C.).

2. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

3. Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) in an un-aided educational institution in the year 2005. According to him, he was subsequently appointed as Principal in the same college through direct recruitment in 2013. The concerned institution was included in the grant-in-aid list in 2016. However, petitioner’s services were not absorbed on the post of Principal at that time, and he was ultimately absorbed as Principal of the concerned institution vide order dated

29.06.2019.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner sought the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 29.06.2019 (annexure no.7) passed by respondent no.4 upto this extent of depriving the petitioner from his claim of payment of salary w.e.f. year 2016 and also depriving him from the benefits of past services rendered in Boxa Janjati Krishak Intermediate College.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.4 to sanction the payment of salary to the petitioner from year 2016 and also grant him benefits for his past services.”

5. Learned State Counsel submits that there is nothing