SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 695

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJESH KUMAR ARYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 404/ 2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel, for the State.

(2) Petitioner participated in a selection, however he was not selected and respondent no. 6 was recommended for selection. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

“i) To, issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quash the selection list dated 27.08.2025, whereby respondent no. 6 (Ashish Kumar) has been declared selected on the post of Assistant Teacher (Hindi) Scheduled Caste category in Gurunanak Purv Madhyamik Vidyalay Khalimahuvat Khatima, District- Udham Singh Nagar. (Contained as Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition)

ii) To, issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for the appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher (Hindi) Scheduled Caste category in Gurunanak Purv Madhyamik Vidyalay Khalimahuvat Khatima, District- U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top