SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 709

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJENDRA PRASAD GAIROLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or SL. No. Date COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 1571/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate with Mr.

Kamlesh Budhlakoti, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel with Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State.

2. Petitioner is challenging the order of suspension dated 30.05.2025, passed by District Education Officer (Elementary), Chamoli.

3. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that earlier also, an order of suspension was passed against petitioner, which was set aside by Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 12.12.2024, passed in Writ Petition No. 382 of 2023 (SS).

4. District Education Officer, however, has proceeded to justify the earlier suspension order, which was quashed by Division Bench of this Court. An observation has been made in the suspension order that subsequent order, issued on 30.05.2025 shall abide by outcome of Writ Petition No. 382 of

2023 (SS).

5. Since the said writ petition was finally decided by Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 12.02.2024, therefore, there is no question of subsequent order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top