SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 739

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 519/ 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Mahesh Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate, for the UPCL.

(2) Petitioner was appointed on a Group ‘D’ post of Coolie in the erstwhile Uttar Pradesh Electricity Board. He was put under suspension, on account of pendency of a criminal trial, w.e.f. 18.8.1995. The trial resulted in his conviction, which was upheld right up to Supreme Court. Conviction of the petitioner resulted in passing of termination order against him. Such termination order was passed on 26.8.2015, which was made effective w.e.f. 28.8.2010. In this writ petition, petitioner contends that although he was paid subsistence allowance for the entire period during which he remained under suspension, however such subsistence allowance was paid as per the pay scales applicable in the year 1995 and the benefit of pay revision was not given while granting subsistence allowance to him. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:

“a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top