SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 785

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SONI RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ASHI SH NAI THANI

16TH JANUARY, 2026 WRI T PETI TI ON ( CRL) NO. 139 OF 2026 Soni Rana …...Petitioner.

Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Geetanjali Dhami, learned counsel.

Counsel for the State : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder.

JUDGMENT :(per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

The petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent nos.2 to 4 to provide immediate and effective police protection to the petitioner and her minor son; to direct the police authorities to ensure the petitioner’s peaceful entry and residence in her matrimonial/ shared household; direct the respondent- police authorities to restore the petitioner’s possession over her matrimonial/ shared household, from which, she has been forcibly dispossessed, and; to ensure that the minor son of the petitioner is not harmed by respondent nos.5 to

9.

2. The petitioner claims herself to be the widow of Late Vijendra Singh Rana. Her case is that after the death of her husband on 01.09.2021, she was thrown

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top