SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972527

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RASHIDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/ S) No. 2940 of 2025 Rashida … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others … Respondents Mr. Pramod Bailwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ganesh Datt Kandpal, Deputy AG, for the State.

J U D G M E N T Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Petitioner was elected as Member, Gram Sabha, Village Hazara Grant, Block Bahadrabad, District Haridwar in the last panchayat elections held in 2022. A complaint was made by one Mr. Nadeem Ali on 25.11.2023 alleging that with her nomination paper filed before Returning Officer, petitioner filed an affidavit stating that she passed 8th Standard examination from SMA Junior High School, Gangalheri, Saharanpur (U.P.) in the year 2004, but as per the certificate issued by Principal of SMA Junior High School, petitioner never studied in the said school, thus petitioner is not educationally qualified for holding the office as Member, Gram Panchayat. An enquiry was ordered to look into the allegation made in the complaint and Nayab Tehsildar issued notice to petitioner, but petitioner did not participate in the enquiry despite notice and the Tehsildar, vide order dated 15.2.2025, declared petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top