HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANGU LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEHRADUN – Respondent
WPSS 1984 / 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 1984/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Papnai, Standing Counsel, for the State.
Mr. Bhupendra Bisht, Advocate, for the respondent no. 3.
Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate, for the respondent no. 4.
(2) Petitioner, who was serving as Paryavaran Mitra in Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital, retired on 30.4.2025. Since his retiral dues have not been cleared so far, therefore, he has approached this Court claiming the following reliefs:
“(i) a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the entire amount of retiral benefits i.e. sanctioned and approved amount of Gratuity to the tune of Rs. 10,63,920-00 and arrear of pension Rs. 20,800-00 per months since the date of retirement of the petitioner with applicable interest payable thereon till final payment of the said amount and further direct to continue pay the pension as and when the same fell due.
(ii) a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to calculate and determine the amount of leave encashment and make payment of the same to the petitioner with applicable interest thereon within a period as stipulated by this Hon’ble court.”
(3) Mr. Bhupendra Bisht, learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.