SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972594

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S GILL ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PARTNER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/ 2377/ 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Syed Kashif Jafri, Advocate holding brief of Dr. K.H. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent – Bank.

4. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 09.10.2025. Today the matter is listed on restoration application.

5. Learned State Counsel does not want to file any objection to the restoration application. Accordingly, restoration application (MCC No. 3 of

2025) is allowed.

6. The order dated 09.10.2025 is recalled. Let the petition be restored to its original number.

7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

8. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.01.2020 passed by District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. Perusal of record reveals that petitioner filed Securitization Application No. 140 of 2021 before Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun. Thus, he has invoked the statutory remedy ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top