HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHADMA SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, S N L o . . Date o R r e d o g e r is r d s tr i r o a e r r c ’s p t i r o o o r n c d s e e e a r d n w i d n i g th s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Signatures SPA No.447 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, learned counsel for appellants appeared through V.C.
2. Mr. R. C. Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
4. This is an intra-Court appeal against judgment dated 24.11.2025 rendered by learned Single Judge in WPMS No.3210 of 2025. By the said order, challenge thrown by appellant to a sealing order passed under Section 28-A of the Uttarakhand Urban and Country Planning Development Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) was rejected on the ground that he has remedy of appeal under clause 4 of Section
28-A of the Act.
5. Appellant has challenged the judgment rendered by learned Single Judge on the ground that the sealing order is passed against one Mr. Javed Siddique, who has nothing to do with the property in question, and appellant’s appeal would not be entertained, as the order of sealing is not passed against him.
6. Learned counsel for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.