SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 840

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
USMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


2026:UHC:644 I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.26 of 2026 Usman & Another ...... Applicants Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Present:

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicants Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

This is an anticipatory bail application moved by the applicants/accused Usman and Savej in Case Crime No.154 of 2025 under Section 3 and 5 r/w Section 11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, P.S. Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar.

2. As per the allegations made in the FIR, information was received at P.S. Kotwali Gangnahar that Aas Mohammad, Salman and the present applicants/accused, after slaughtering a cow, are making pieces of beef for the purpose of selling it. Acting upon the said information, the police conducted a raid at the spot, however, some persons who could not be recognized, managed to flee from the spot.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants/accused submits that the applicants/accused are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top