SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1050

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHASHANK SINGH RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1 No.2250 of 2025 with BA1 No.2098 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Raj Kumar Singh and Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocates for the applicants.

Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the respondent.

2. First bail application (BA1 No.2250 of 2025) has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.RC00072025A0004, under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station C.B.I., A.C.B., Dehradun. First bail application (BA1 No.2098 of 2025) has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.RC00072025A0004/2025, under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 (subsequently added in THE charge sheet), registered at Police Station C.B.I./S.P.E./A.C.B., Dehradun.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case, possess no criminal antecedents, and are in judicial custody since 15.07.2025. It is contended that the essential twin ingredients of “demand” and “acceptance” of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top