SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1059

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AMAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS 339/ 2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan and Mr. Suryakant Maithani, Counsel for the petitioners.

Mr. Yogesh Pande, Deputy AG, for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Ishwary Datt Paliwal, Standing Counsel, for the State of U.P.

(2) Petitioners are residents of Village Chandpuri Khadar, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar. According to them, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, as applicable to Uttarakhand, on 12.7.2012, but thereafter no further step was taken. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:

“I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents commanding the respondents to complete the consolidation of land proceedings of Village Chandpuri Khadar Khurd, Pargana Gordhanpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar, as expeditiously as possible under the facts and circumstances of the case and/or within a definite period of time.

II. Declare inaction on the part of respondents for not co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top