SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1062

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Pankaj Purohit, J
Saurabh Fulara – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
WPMS No.915 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.K. Sharma
For the Respondents: Swati Verma, Rajesh Sharma, Raunak Pant, Naresh Pant

The court held that challenges to the assessment of compensation for land acquired under the National Highway Act, 1956, must be pursued through the statutory arbitration process provided under Section 3G(5) before the Arbitrator/District Magistrate.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition - Compensation Re-assessment - Statutory Remedy - Where a grievance exists regarding the calculation of compensation for land acquired under the National Highway Act, 1956, the appropriate remedy is to approach the Arbitrator/District Magistrate under Section 3G(5) rather than filing a writ petition. (Para 9, 10)

Issues: Whether the petitioners can seek re-assessment of compensation through a writ petition when a statutory remedy is available under the National Highway Act, 1956.

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings

SL. No Date or directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures

5. The present writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to conduct inspection of the property in-question owned by petitioners and further to reassessing the compensation.

6. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioners that petitioner’s property comprised in Gata No.174ba of village Naya Gaon Chauhan, Tehsil Ramnagar, District Nainital, on which house is also standing, was acquired by respondent No.4-NHAI for construction/widening of the National Highway No.121 (New No.309).

7. It is further contended by learned counsel for petitioners that house in- question was not only residential but it had two shops also, therefore, it was commercial building. But the compensation which has been calculated and arrived at by the respondent No.4 is only of residential house. It is feeling aggrieved by the said compensation arrived at by respondent No.4, petitioners are before this Court.

8. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners want to re-assess the compensation which has already been calculated and deposited by respondent No.4-NHAI with CALA.

9. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4-NHAI submits that petitioners can raise their grievances under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956 before the Arbitrator/District Magistrate, District Nainital.

10. In such view of the matter, no interference is required by this Court. The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed in-limine. Petitioners may raise arbitration before the Arbitrator as stated above.

11. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top