SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1108

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions No. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s

2026:UHC:2604 order with Signatures BA1 No.137 of 2026 Deepak Kumar Sharma Vs.

State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA for the State.

3. Present bail application has been filed by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.0098 of 2025 under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, P.S. Tanakpur, District Champawat.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant at the outset submits that the mandatory provisions of law as provided under Section 42, 50, 52, 54 and 57 of the NDPS Act have not been followed and the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter and is languishing in jail since 08.09.2025. It is stated that he has no criminal history and there are no public witness to corroborate the story. It is stated that the applicant is accused of possession of the contraband named, charas weighing 1.208 gram whereas he comes from poor background and does not have financial capacity to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top