SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1120

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GAURAV JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 138 of 2019

24 April, 2026 Gaurav Jain --Revisionist Versus

1: State of Uttarakhand

2: Smt. Priyanka Jain

3: Km. Sunakshi --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Tarun Prakash Singh Takuli, Advocate for the revisionist.

Ms. Zeba Naaz, learned Counsel i/b Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

1) The present criminal revision, preferred under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been preferred by the revisionist against the order dated 15.12.2018 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in Misc. Criminal Case No. 96 of 2017, titled “Gaurav Jain vs. Smt. Priyanka Jain & Anr.”, under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C., whereby the application of the revisionist seeking recall of the ex-parte order has been dismissed.

2) The facts of the case are that the revisionist, Gaurav Jain, is the husband of respondent no. 2, Smt. Priyanka Jain, and father of respondent no. 3, a minor child. Disputes arose between the parties, following which respondent no. 2 began residing separately with the minor child. Mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top