SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1137

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PANKAJ PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 635/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Ishwari Datt Paliwal, Advocate, i/b Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional CSC, for the State.

(2) Petitioner applied for the post of Veterinary Pharmacist, pursuant to an advertisement issued on 21.12.2016. Since petitioner was not recommended for appointment, therefore, he has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

“i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Veterinary Pharmacist pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.12.2016, considering the petitioner dependent of Rajya Andolankari.

ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to give all consequential benefit to the petitioner.”

(3) Petitioner contends that as per the government policy, horizontal reservation to the extent of ten per cent is available to Rajya Andolankari in State services and there are vacancies available on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top