HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
THAKUR SINGH DOSAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 2294 / 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.
and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 2294/ 2025 With WPSS/ 2296/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Mohit Bhauryal, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in both the petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPSS No. 2294 of 2025 alone are being considered and discussed.
4. Petitioner was initially appointed on daily wages on 19.03.1975 for discharging duties as Forest Guard and his services were regularised on 15.09.2003. Petitioner retired from the post of Forest Guard on 30.09.2012. After his retirement, petitioner was not given pension on the ground that he has not rendered minimum qualifying service of ten years, post regularisation. Petitioner filed a writ petition and pursuant to the direction in that writ petition, petitioner was given pension.
5. Petitioner contends in this writ petition that earlier he was given ₹12600+Dearness Relief as pension; however, by communication dated 04.09.2025, issued by Divisional Forest Officer, Bageshwar Forest Division,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.