SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1207

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Vinay Kumar AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (SS) No. 2292 of 2018 Vinay Kumar and Others ...Petitioners Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Others ...Respondents With Writ Petition (SS) No. 172 of 2019 Laxman Singh Samant and Another ...Petitioners Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Others ...Respondents Presence:

1. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Swati Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

3. Mr. Shashank Upadhyaya, learned counsel for respondent no. 5.

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Oral)

1. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners filed a supplementary affidavit bringing on record the office letter issued by the Director dated 16.02.2026, whereby, in compliance to the interim direction of this court dated 15.01.2026 in WPSS No. 143 of 2026 the provisional appointment has been offered to the candidate, who are B.Ed. degree holder, and having the eligibility of CTET-I with this stipulation that the appointment shall be subject to the final outcome of this petition. Mr. Negi pointed out that on the previous date the Secretary to the Government placed by placing reliance to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top