SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1209

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ARVIND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures C482/ 1263/ 2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicants.

2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Mr. Parth Tamta, learned counsel for respondent no.2/complainant.

4. Present C-482 application has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned chargesheet, cognizance/summoning order dated 24.03.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Criminal Case No.5392 of 2023, along with the entire proceedings of the said criminal case.

5. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the dispute in question emanates from matrimonial discord between applicant no.1 (husband) and respondent no.2 (wife). Applicant nos.2 and 3 are father-in-law and brother-in-law of respondent no.2. It is contended that due to certain matrimonial differences, respondent no.2 lodged an F.I.R. under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act; that, Investigating Officer after completion of investigation has submitted chargesh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top