SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ, Subhash Upadhyay, J
Mohd. Shahzad – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 64 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Piyush Garg
For the Respondents: B.P.S. Mer, Bhuwan Bhatt, Saif Hameed, Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna

A dispute between two religious communities regarding the right to use a burial ground is a civil matter and is not maintainable as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

Headnote:(A) Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability - Dispute between two religious sects (Barelvi and Deobandi) regarding the right to use a burial ground (Kabristan) is a civil dispute and does not qualify as a matter of public interest. (Para 3)

Issues: Whether a dispute over burial rights between two communities within a religion is maintainable as a Public Interest Litigation.

Table of Content
1. claims regarding burial rights in kabristan (Para 1 , 2)
2. pil not maintainable for community burial disputes (Para 3)
3. petition and pending applications disposed of (Para 4 , 5)

The Court m ade the follow ing:

JUDGMENT:

(per Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1) The following reliefs have been prayed for in the present writ petition :

(a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 to ensure that no interference is caused at the hands of respondent Nos. 8 to 16, in burial of the dead bodies and in performance of post death rituals of the members belonging to Barelvi community in the Kabristan situated in Village Bhaniyawala, Tehsil Doiwala, District Dehradun and be directed to ensure that adequate protection is being provided for peaceful burial of the dead bodies and post death rituals of the members belonging to Barelvi community in the said Kabristan.

(b) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 8 to 16 to not to cause any hurdle or interference in burial of the dead bodies and in performance of post death rituals of the members belonging to Barelvi community in the Kabristan situated in Village Bhaniyawala, Tehsil Doiwala, District Dehradun.

2) The petitioner has asserted right of burial in a Kabristan situated in village Bhaniyawala in favour of the members of Barelvi community of Muslim religion. The petition has been filed in a representative capacity. The allegation is that the burial ground is being used by members of another Muslim community namely Deobandi community and respondent Nos. 8 to 16, who belong to the said community, are not permitting the members of Barelvi community to use the burial ground although the strength of the said community in the village is much higher as compared to the strength of Deobandi community.

3) The right of burial being claimed by members of a particular community of Muslim as against the other community, in our considered opinion, would not be a matter falling under Public Interest Litigation. We leave it open to the petitioner and members of the said community to establish the said right in appropriate civil proceedings or by such other mode as may be advised.

4) The writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

5) Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top