SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1287

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHUBHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1 No.1775 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the complainant.

2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.245 of 2025, under Section 3(5), 351(3), 70(2), 65(1) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3(a)/4(ii), 5(l)(g)/6 of POCSO Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar.

3. The First Information Report was lodged by the father of the victim alleging that the mother of the victim had compelled her 13-year-old daughter to engage in sexual intercourse with the applicant and another co-accused on several occasions. It is further alleged that the victim was forced to consume intoxicating liquor. The alleged incidents are stated to have taken place at Haridwar, Agra, Ghaziabad, and Vrindavan. The statements of the victim were recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of B.N.S.S. 2023, wherein she supported the prosecution version. She was also medically examin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top