HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
FAZLA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMAD AHMAD – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SI DDHARTHA SAH
06TH MAY, 2026 WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 1621 OF 2015 (M/ S)
Fazla ..…Petitioner Versus Mohammad Ahmad S/o Late Mahmood and Others ……Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate.
No.1 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. ( Oral)
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 24.04.2015, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Additional Collector, Haridwar (hereinafter referred as Deputy Director of Consolidation) in Revision No.56 of 2013-2014, “Mahmood vs. Fazla and Another”, by means of which an amendment application has been allowed whereby certain paragraphs have been incorporated in the memo of revision and also the names of Jameel and Saleem sons of Rahamilahi was sought to be impleaded as respondent nos.3 and 4, whereas Jahangeer s/o late Shaukat was sought to be impleaded as respondent no.5 & name of Mansab s/o Jahoora was sought to be impleaded as respondent no.6 in the revision which was pending in the court of Deputy Director of Consolidation.
2. Assailing the said or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.