SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1290

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
FAZLA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMAD AHMAD – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SI DDHARTHA SAH

06TH MAY, 2026 WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 1621 OF 2015 (M/ S)

Fazla ..…Petitioner Versus Mohammad Ahmad S/o Late Mahmood and Others ……Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate.

No.1 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. ( Oral)

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 24.04.2015, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Additional Collector, Haridwar (hereinafter referred as Deputy Director of Consolidation) in Revision No.56 of 2013-2014, “Mahmood vs. Fazla and Another”, by means of which an amendment application has been allowed whereby certain paragraphs have been incorporated in the memo of revision and also the names of Jameel and Saleem sons of Rahamilahi was sought to be impleaded as respondent nos.3 and 4, whereas Jahangeer s/o late Shaukat was sought to be impleaded as respondent no.5 & name of Mansab s/o Jahoora was sought to be impleaded as respondent no.6 in the revision which was pending in the court of Deputy Director of Consolidation.

2. Assailing the said or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top