SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1303

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KANHAIYA KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 369/ 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Narendra Bali, Central Govt.

Standing Counsel, for the respondent no. 1 to

5.

(2) Petitioner is serving as Assistant Sub Inspector (Steno) in Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). He is aggrieved by denial of promotion to the post of Sub Inspector (Steno) in the promotion exercise held in 2019. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

“i. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to provide the petitioner break-up details and his marks in departmental promotion committee held vide letter dated 20.09.2018.

ii. A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for records and quash the impugned promotion order dated 22.08.2019.

iii. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to add/give 55 marks for the annual performance appraisal reports (APARs) into his total marks of DPC and duly promote the petitioner from due promotion

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top