HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KANHAIYA KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 369/ 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Narendra Bali, Central Govt.
Standing Counsel, for the respondent no. 1 to
5.
(2) Petitioner is serving as Assistant Sub Inspector (Steno) in Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). He is aggrieved by denial of promotion to the post of Sub Inspector (Steno) in the promotion exercise held in 2019. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“i. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to provide the petitioner break-up details and his marks in departmental promotion committee held vide letter dated 20.09.2018.
ii. A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for records and quash the impugned promotion order dated 22.08.2019.
iii. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to add/give 55 marks for the annual performance appraisal reports (APARs) into his total marks of DPC and duly promote the petitioner from due promotion
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.