SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1333

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
CHANDRA MOHAN SINGH PANWAR – Appellant
Versus
KEDAR SINGH DANU – Respondent


Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. (oral)

The present First Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2018 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pauri Garhwal in Original Suit No. 06/2016 (Chandra Mohan Singh Panwar Vs. Kedar Singh Danu), whereby, while deciding preliminary issue no. 4 the trial court has held that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the suit.

2. In brief, the suit for perpetual injunction and possession was instituted before the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pauri Garhwal by the plaintiff with the pleadings that he is the bhumidhar of Khet Nos. 677 and 678, Khata No. 82, measuring 300 square meters, situated at Village Ganganali, Patti Katalsyu, Tehsil Srinagar. It was pleaded that the plaintiff had purchased the said land vide registered sale deed dated 15th July, 2004 from one Durga Prasad, which was duly registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Srinagar on the same date. It was further pleaded that the defendant had purchased an area of 400 square metres within Khet Nos. 677 and 678 of Khata No. 82 vide a registered sale deed dated 15th July, 2004 from the same vendor, namely Durga Prasad, which w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top