SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1340

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ABHISHEK SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


COURT’S OR JUDGES’S Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2026:UHC:3262 BA1 No. 238 of 2026 Abhishek Sharma ....Applicant Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Abhishek Sharma, S/o Shri Sunil Sharma, R/o Rajendra Nagar, Haldwani, District Nainital. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No. 0115 of 2025, registered at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital, for offences punishable under Sections 65(1), 137(2), 87, 351(2) of B.N.S. and under Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. 4. Heard Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Chitrartha Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. Perused the record.

5. As per the prosecution case, the complainant lodged the FIR alleging that the present Applicant had been harassing her 15-year- old daughter despite repeated warnings. It is alleged that the Applicant entice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top