SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1379

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIKAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


COURT’S OR JUDGES’S Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2026:UHC:2416 BA1 No. 345 of 2026 Vikas ....Applicant Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Vikas, aged about 24 years, S/o Ajay Singh, R/o Village Kharmasi, Tehsil and P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No. 04 of 2026, registered at Police Station Ranikhet, District Almora, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

4. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the Applicant, and Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State. The record has been perused.

5. The primary grounds for bail, as advanced on behalf of the Applicant, are that the Applicant and co-accused persons have been falsely implicated; that the alleged recovery is a joint recovery, but no specific attribution has been made as to which bag belonged to wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top