SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1380

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANMOL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with COURT’S OR JUDG

2 ES 0 ’ 2 S

6:UHC:2415 Signatures BA1 No. 352 of 2026 Anmol Singh ....Applicant Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Anmol Singh, aged about 27 years, S/o Variyam Singh, R/o Village Rampura, Ramnagar Road, Kashipur, Tehsil and P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No. 04 of 2026, registered at Police Station Ranikhet, District Almora, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

4. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the Applicant, and Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State. The record has been perused.

5. The primary grounds for bail, as advanced on behalf of the Applicant, are that the Applicant and co-accused persons have been falsely implicated; that the alleged recovery is a joint recovery, but no specific attribution h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top