SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1400

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GOPINATH VAJPAI – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB/ 67/ 2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

1. Ms. Bhawna Kanwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the respondent-Selecting Body.

4. Petitioner possesses three years diploma in Hotel Management & Catering Technology from Government Management Hotel & Catering Technology Institute, Dehradun. He responded to an advertisement dated 03.02.2015 issued by Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, whereby applications were invited for appointment to the post of Lecturer (Cookery, Bakery, Housekeeping, Restaurant, Reception) in Tourism Department.

5. As many as four vacancies on the aforesaid post were notified by the said advertisement, however, no one was selected for the post in question as none of the candidate, who applied pursuant to the advertisement, possessed the requisite qualification. The requisite qualification is mentioned in the advertisement as three year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top