SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1416

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIMLESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 863/ 2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Standing Counsel, for the State.

2. Petitioner participated in a selection for the post of Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School in District Almora and she claimed benefit of reservation available to Other Backward Classes. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had staked claim for appointment on a post in “other than Science subjects”. Grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though she scored 70.61 quality point marks in the selection, yet she has not been recommended for appointment.

3. Learned State Counsel was asked to get instructions in the matter. Based on written instructions, received from the O/o District Education Officer, Almora, Mr. S.S. Chaudhary submits that petitioner belongs to OBC category and the last candidate, who was recommended for appointment in “other than Science subjects” in the said category, scored 76.008 quality point marks. Thus learned State Counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top