HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ISHAN PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL. Office Notes, No. Date reports, orders or proceedings COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures ABA No. 13 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned A.G.A.
along for the State.
3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved by the applicant Ishan Prakash S/o Neeraj Kumar Gupta praying for anticipatory bail in relation to FIR dated 15.01.2020 bearing FIR No.0011 of 2020, registered at P.S. Rajpur, District Dehradun,wherein he has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120-B of IPC, 1860.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the Investigating Officer which is evident from the fact that the applicant was not named in the FIR and in fact some of the officers of the finance company were implicated. He submits that during investigation all the officers of the finance company have been exonerated and the present applicant who was not named in the FIR has been charge sheeted and penal provision i.e. Section 120-B IPC has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.