SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1466

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ISHAN PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL. Office Notes, No. Date reports, orders or proceedings COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures ABA No. 13 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned A.G.A.

along for the State.

3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved by the applicant Ishan Prakash S/o Neeraj Kumar Gupta praying for anticipatory bail in relation to FIR dated 15.01.2020 bearing FIR No.0011 of 2020, registered at P.S. Rajpur, District Dehradun,wherein he has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120-B of IPC, 1860.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the Investigating Officer which is evident from the fact that the applicant was not named in the FIR and in fact some of the officers of the finance company were implicated. He submits that during investigation all the officers of the finance company have been exonerated and the present applicant who was not named in the FIR has been charge sheeted and penal provision i.e. Section 120-B IPC has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top