SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1485

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
EHETESHAM HAIDER – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 2874/ 2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional CSC, for the State.

(2) Petitioners responded to an advertisement issued by Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education for the post of Statistical Assistant. They participated in the selection, however they were not called for document verification on the ground that they had crossed the upper age limit of 40 years as on 1.1.2014. Thus feeling aggrieved, petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking the following relief:

“i) issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for the post of Statistical Assistant and may call them for interview as well as for verification of documents as per merit list dated

19.09.2017.”

(3) Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submits that the rules framed by the State Government regarding age for employment in State services were amended vide notification dated 25.2.2014 and upper age limit was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top