SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1503

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 737/ 2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Standing Counsel, for the State.

Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate, for the selecting body.

(2) Petitioner is ex-serviceman, who was discharged from Indian Army in the year 2017. He was thereafter appointed as Village Development Officer against a vacancy reserved for ex-servicemen. Petitioner thereafter applied for the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade, pursuant to an advertisement issued by Uttarakhand Subordinate Services Selection Commission on 14.3.2024. According to petitioner, even though he was selected and recommended for appointment as Assistant Teacher, LT Grade, however selecting body thereafter issued a letter to the appointing authority on 13.10.2025, stating that petitioner has already availed the benefit of reservation available to ex-servicemen, therefore he is not eligible for appointment against a vacancy reserved for ex-servicemen. Petitioner has challenged the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top