SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1511

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANITA NEGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Bench No.496 of 2023

20 March, 2026 Anita Negi and Ors. --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Ors. --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:

Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for petitioners.

Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. (Oral)

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Petitioners were serving as Senior Administrative Officer before their promotion to the post of State Tax Officer. It is not in dispute that petitioners were promoted as State Tax Officer on 12.07.2016. While serving as Senior Administrative Officer, petitioners were getting salary in the Pay-Scale Rs. 9300-34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4800. Upon their promotion to the post of State Tax Officer, they were given salary in the Pay-Scale Rs.

9300-34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4600.

2. Petitioners made representation to the Commissioner Tax contending that upon their promotion, their Grade Pay cannot be reduced. The representation was rejected by learned Additional Commissione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top