SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1518

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KANAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL/ 502/ 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Ms. Aishwarya Thapliyal, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. By the instant writ petition, the petitioners are praying for the following reliefs:-

i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents no. 1 & 2 to provide adequate and immediate police protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners.

ii) Issue a writ order or direction restraining the family members of petitioner no. 1 or any other private persons from causing any harm, harassment or interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and were in love with each other and married on 17.03.2026 at Shivmandir, Thakurdwara and the certificate of marriage is also enclosed. In support of age, copy of Aadhar card of both the petitioners have been enclosed

5. It is argued that there is a threat perception from respondent no. 3, father of petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top