SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1526

I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA


19TH MAR CH, 2026


WRI T PETI TON NO. 568 of 2022 ( M/ S)


Devendra Singh ..…Petitioner Versus Rajdeep Singh and Others .…Respondents


Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Bhatt, Advocate.


ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.


DP aantt e: 19.03.2026

H on’ble Alok Kum ar Verm a,J.

Learned Tehsildar, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar closed the opportunity of the petitioner – opposite party to adduce evidence vide order dated 18.01.2020 in Case No.30/1080 of the year, 2018-2019, filed under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 (as applicable in the State of Uttarakhand). A Revision (No.72 (2020-21)/35 (2019-20), “Devendra Singh vs. Rajdeep Singh and Others”) was filed. The said Revision has been dismissed vide judgment dated 20.12.2021, passed by learned Commissioner, Kumaon Mandal, Nainital. Hence, the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Deepak Bhatt, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate, has requested on instructions to dispose of the present writ petition directing the Tehsildar, Bazpur to decide the said Case No.30/1080, filed under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901, within three months.

4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondents.

5. On the request of both the parties, the order dated 18.01.2020, passed by learned Tehsildar, Bazpur, and, the judgment dated 20.12.2021, passed by learned Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital are set aside. Learned Tehsildar, Bazpur is directed to decide the Case No.30/1080, filed under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901, as expeditiously as possible, as per law, but not later than three months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of this order.

6. The present Writ Petition [No.568 of 2022 (M/S)] is disposed of accordingly.

7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top