SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1571

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. Dat No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures BA1 No. 356 of 2026 Surendra --Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Modification Application (MCRC No. 1 of 2026) has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 16.03.2026, whereby the Applicant was granted bail in connection with FIR No. 370 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections

66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act.

4. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant as well as learned State Counsel and perused the record.

5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that due to inadvertence, Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 has been mentioned in the order dated 16.03.2026, whereas the correct provision applicable in the present case is Section 61(2) of the said Act. It is submitted that the present application seeks correction of the said typographical/clerical er

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top