SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1583

WPSS/ 2116/ 2023


Hon’ble Manoj Kum ar Tiw ari, J

Office Notes, reports, orders S N L o . . Date a o n o r d r p d r R o i e r c e g e c i e s t d i t o r in a n r g s ’ s s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS S o i r g d n e a r t w ur i e th s

1. Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. Petitioner was engaged on contract for discharging duties as Clerk in Registration Department of the State w.e.f. 22.05.2017. However, process for regular selection against that post was held, and ultimately Ms. Jyoti Nag was allegedly offered appointment against the post of Registration Clerk on which petitioner was earlier engaged.

5. Petitioner contends in this writ petition that since Ms. Jyoti Nag has not joined duties against the post of Registration Clerk, therefore, petitioner may be permitted to continue against the said post.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that petitioner is out of employment since 17.01.2022.

7. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the withheld salary/honorarium of petitioner w.e.f. March 2018 to 18.1.2022 adjusting the amount which has been paid to petitioner after the order of

NSIINTGI RHA AJ SWALDO28sFD e4.biNaF rg0ti:Uae 8tc l:6aTd2N =l10I u yNA3=m CRs,6eio9bag.F=0cKnE3Hre=62IdAG74 Ab5a E3yD7CB0,N:Of2I74TU,8 CpR7Bo1A2Fs eO-60Jt9aFS3lBIC'UN7ofTG6d8,H ec9 =nA3RC24SB6fNWK0IHF7T4L RN1 CA,D 2sJ,t S=o5EIUuNa3=TDG8H2HA5I6 GfRF9HS8W CK0CH2OaLU3N RD0TC ,

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top