SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1596

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUREJ KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL. Office Notes, No. Date reports, orders or COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL No. 446 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr.Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners praying for the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 and 2 to provide adequate protection to the petitioners from respondent no.3 and other family members of petitioner no.1 so that they may live peaceful marital life.

4. It is contended that both the petitioners are in love with each other and both are major and married with each other in Vankhandi Mahadev Shivalaya, Chakarpur District Udham Singh Nagar on 09.03.2026 and certain photographs of the marriage has also enclosed. It is submitted that according to their date of birth both are major. In support of the age, copy of Aadhar Card of both of them have also been enclosed. It is further contended that there is a threat perception from Respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top